Polling guru John Curtice shocks Nicola Sturgeon with independence referendum warning | World | News

Legal Notice: Product prices and availability are subject to change. Visit corresponding website for more details. Trade marks & images are copyrighted by their respective owners.

Professor Curtice, who teaches at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow, said the election result was an inadequate way of judging support for a second poll. Instead, the professor said, two polls done during the election campaign were a better way of quantifying public feeling towards the policy. In a blog on his website What Thinks, Professor Curtice said using the number of seats to claim a mandate does not take into account the effect of the first past the post system, and how it calculates seats from votes

Neither, the blog said, should the SNP claim a mandate based on share of the vote at the December election because voters may not have agreed with the SNP stance on the referendum, but still voted for them regardless.

The SNP won 47 seats in the December vote, an increase of 12 from their previous tally, leading to senior figures in the party claiming it is time for a second independence referendum.

A week later, the First Minister formally asked for the powers to hold a referendum from the Prime Minister, something he rejected this week.

However, Professor Curtice claims in his blog that two polls conducted during the election campaign present a better picture of attitudes towards another referendum than the general election.

He said: “One of these polls came from Ipsos MORI, the other from Panelbase.

The former asked people whether they supported or opposed holding another independence referendum within the next year.

“While 42% said that they supported the idea, as many as 50% indicated that they were opposed.

“Meanwhile, Panelbase reported that only 38% backed the idea of holding a referendum before the next Scottish Parliament election, while as many as 51% were opposed.

READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon savaged in fiery FMQs clash over Scottish education

“Or does the UK government persuade people north of the border Brexit is going to work out to the country’s advantage.

“In this case maybe the increased support for independence that was in evidence last year could melt away, and with it support for another ballot.

“Neither side in the debate can be sure of what the answers to these crucial questions will be.”

The polling guru’s views comes as a second blow to the Scottish First Minister after reports of the fiscal differences between Scotland and the rest of the UK.

Scotland’s superior deficit performance came to an end 30 years ago and for the past ten years the picture has been one of significant deteriorations relative to the rest of the UK.

According to the Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS), in 2018-19, the country ran a budget deficit of 7 percent of gross domestic product, compared with 1.1 percent for the whole of the UK.

Scotland’s revenue per head, even including a geographic share of North Sea revenues, was £11,531, compared with £11,838 for the whole of the UK.

Moreover, Scotland’s public expenditure per head is significantly higher than the whole of the UK – £13,854 versus £12,193.

Source link

Clickbank Guide & Tools